ass日本风韵熟妇pics男人扒开女人屁屁桶到爽|扒开胸露出奶头亲吻视频|邻居少妇的诱惑|人人妻在线播放|日日摸夜夜摸狠狠摸婷婷|制服 丝袜 人妻|激情熟妇中文字幕|看黄色欧美特一级|日本av人妻系列|高潮对白av,丰满岳妇乱熟妇之荡,日本丰满熟妇乱又伦,日韩欧美一区二区三区在线

基于數(shù)值天氣預(yù)報(bào)后處理的參考作物蒸散量預(yù)報(bào)改進(jìn)
CSTR:
作者:
作者單位:

作者簡(jiǎn)介:

通訊作者:

中圖分類號(hào):

基金項(xiàng)目:

山東省自然科學(xué)基金項(xiàng)目(ZR2020ME254,、ZR2020QD061)和國(guó)家自然科學(xué)基金項(xiàng)目(51879196,、51309016)


Improvement of Reference Crop Evapotranspiration Forecasting Based on Numerical Weather Prediction Post Processing
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 圖/表
  • |
  • 訪問統(tǒng)計(jì)
  • |
  • 參考文獻(xiàn)
  • |
  • 相似文獻(xiàn)
  • |
  • 引證文獻(xiàn)
  • |
  • 資源附件
  • |
  • 文章評(píng)論
    摘要:

    針對(duì)基于數(shù)值天氣預(yù)報(bào)(Numerical weather prediction,NWP)對(duì)參考作物蒸散量(Reference crop evapotranspiration,,ET0)進(jìn)行預(yù)報(bào)通常需要數(shù)據(jù)偏差校正的問題,,基于LightGBM機(jī)器學(xué)習(xí)方法和我國(guó)西北地區(qū)9個(gè)氣象站點(diǎn)數(shù)據(jù)提出一種對(duì)第二代全球集合預(yù)報(bào)系統(tǒng)(Global ensemble forecast system,GEFSv2)預(yù)報(bào)氣象因子進(jìn)行偏差校正的方法(M3),。該方法使用太陽輻射,、最高和最低氣溫、相對(duì)濕度和風(fēng)速集合分別對(duì)每個(gè)氣象因子進(jìn)行重預(yù)報(bào),,再計(jì)算ET0,。使用等距離累積分布函數(shù)(EDCDFm,M1)和單氣象因子輸入的LightGBM法(M2)對(duì)模型精度進(jìn)行評(píng)估,。結(jié)果表明,,GEFSv2的預(yù)報(bào)因子與相應(yīng)的觀測(cè)氣象因子之間存在不匹配問題,其不匹配程度因氣象因子不同而不同,,太陽輻射的匹配度較高,,相對(duì)濕度的匹配度較低。M3模型有助于緩解數(shù)據(jù)不匹配問題,。M1,、M2和M3方法在9站點(diǎn)預(yù)報(bào)ET0的平均均方根誤差(RMSE)分別介于0.66~0.93mm/d、0.57~0.83mm/d和0.53~0.79mm/d,,平均絕對(duì)誤差(MAE)分別介于0.44~0.61mm/d,、0.38~0.56mm/d和0.35~0.53mm/d,決定系數(shù)(R2)分別介于0.82~0.91,、0.84~0.93和0.86~0.94,。3種方法均在夏季誤差最大,1~16d平均RMSE分別為1.21,、1.18,、1.04mm/d。各預(yù)報(bào)因子中太陽輻射對(duì)ET0預(yù)報(bào)誤差影響最大,,其后依次是風(fēng)速,、最高氣溫,、相對(duì)濕度和最低氣溫。在后處理過程中,,NWP的最高氣溫預(yù)報(bào)值對(duì)其他因子預(yù)報(bào)精度的貢獻(xiàn)最大,、對(duì)相對(duì)濕度預(yù)報(bào)精度的貢獻(xiàn)最小。建議在進(jìn)行NWP偏差校正時(shí),,應(yīng)考慮數(shù)據(jù)不匹配問題,,通過多因子校正來彌補(bǔ)預(yù)報(bào)精度的不足,。

    Abstract:

    Reference crop evapotranspiration (ET0) forecasting is of great significance for irrigation decision making and water resources management. ET0 forecasting using numerical weather prediction (NWP) has been proved to be an effective method, but this method usually requires bias correction. A bias-correction method (M3) for the forecast weather factors from the global ensemble forecast system (GEFSv2) was established based on the LightGBM machine learning method and the data of nine meteorological stations in Northwest China. In this method, solar radiation, maximum and minimum temperature, relative humidity and wind speed were used to reforecast each meteorological factor respectively, and then ET0 was calculated. The performance of the M3 model was evaluated by equidistant cumulative distribution function (EDCDFm, M1) and LightGBM method (M2) with single meteorological factor as input. The results showed that there was a mismatch between the forecast factors of GEFSv2 and the corresponding observed meteorological factors. The degree of mismatch varied with the meteorological factors. The matching degree of solar radiation was the highest, and relative humidity was the lowest. The newly established M3 model was superior to both M1 and M2 methods in predicting meteorological factors. In terms of ET0 forecasting, the average root mean squared error (RMSE) of M1, M2 and M3 were in the range of 0.66~0.93mm/d, 0.57~0.83mm/d and 0.53~0.79mm/d at nine stations, the mean squared error (MAE) were in the range of 0.44~0.61mm/d, 0.38~0.56mm/d and 0.35~0.53mm/d, and the R2 were 0.82~0.91, 0.84~0.93 and 0.86~0.94, respectively. The error of the three methods were the largest in summer, and the average RMSE from 1 day to 16 days were 1.21mm/d, 1.18mm/d and 1.04mm/d, respectively. Among all forecasting factors, solar radiation had the greatest influence on ET0 forecasting error, followed by wind speed, maximum temperature, relative humidity and minimum temperature. In the post-process, the maximum temperature forecast value of NWP had the largest contribution to the forecast of other factors, while the contribution of relative humidity was the least. It was suggested that data mismatch should be considered in NWP bias correction, and multi-factor correction should be used to improve the prediction accuracy. 

    參考文獻(xiàn)
    相似文獻(xiàn)
    引證文獻(xiàn)
引用本文

姚付啟,董建華,范軍亮,曾文治,吳立峰.基于數(shù)值天氣預(yù)報(bào)后處理的參考作物蒸散量預(yù)報(bào)改進(jìn)[J].農(nóng)業(yè)機(jī)械學(xué)報(bào),2021,52(7):293-303. YAO Fuqi, DONG Jianhua, FAN Junliang, ZENG Wenzhi, WU Lifeng. Improvement of Reference Crop Evapotranspiration Forecasting Based on Numerical Weather Prediction Post Processing[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery,2021,52(7):293-303.

復(fù)制
分享
文章指標(biāo)
  • 點(diǎn)擊次數(shù):
  • 下載次數(shù):
  • HTML閱讀次數(shù):
  • 引用次數(shù):
歷史
  • 收稿日期:2021-03-22
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 錄用日期:
  • 在線發(fā)布日期: 2021-07-10
  • 出版日期:
文章二維碼